Index to links for TMEP, TBMP & Statutes found on Not Just Patents web sites:
TMEP 602 http://stepstoatrademark.com/tmep602.html
TMEP 715 http://publishedforoppositiontrademark.com/tmep715.html
TMEP 806 http://stepstoatrademark.com/tmep806.html
TMEP 807 http://functionasamark.com/tmep807.html
TMEP 904 http://stepstoatrademark.com/tmep904.html
TMEP 906 http://stepstoatrademark.com/tmep906.html
TMEP 1202-
TMEP 1202.03-
TMEP 1207 http://likelihoodofconfusiontrademark.com/tmep1207.html
TMEP 1209 http://merely-
TMEP 1212 http://merely-
TMEP 1213 http://merely-
TMEP 1301 http://functionasamark.com/tmep1301.html
TMEP 1401.02(a) &(b) http://trademarksteps.com/trademarkidmanual.html
TMEP 1715 http://publishedforoppositiontrademark.com/tmep1715.html
TBMP 309 http://stepstoatrademark.net/tbmp309.html
TBMP 311 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp311.html
TBMP 701 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp701tbmp702.html
TBMP 702 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp701tbmp702.html
TBMP 703 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp703.html
TBMP 704 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp704.html
TBMP 1215 http://merely-
Latest Revision of TTAB Manual (TBMP) May 2011 is available at NoticeOfOpposition.com in text format for easy browser searching
CHAPTER 100 GENERAL INFORMATION
CHAPTER 200 EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO OPPOSE
CHAPTER 500 STIPULATIONS AND MOTIONS
CHAPTER 600 WITHDRAWAL; SETTLEMENT
CHAPTER 700 TRIAL PROCEDURE AND INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE
CHAPTER 800 BRIEFS ON CASE, ORAL HEARING, FINAL DECISION
CHAPTER 900 REVIEW OF DECISION OF BOARD
CHAPTER 1100 CONCURRENT USE PROCEEDINGS
Excerpts from Trademark Act of 1946, as Amended
PUBLIC LAW 79-
(found at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/tmlaw2.pdf)
(Jan. 16, 2009 revision)
§ 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1051) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1051
§ 2 (15 U.S.C. § 1052) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1052
§ 3 (15 U.S.C. § 1053) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1053
§ 12 (15 U.S.C. § 1062) http://stepstoatrademark.com/publishedforopposition.html
§ 13 (15 U.S.C. § 1063) http://stepstoatrademark.com/publishedforopposition.html
§ 13 (15 U.S.C. § 1063) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1063
§ 14 (15 U.S.C. § 1064) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1064
§ 15 (15 U.S.C. § 1065) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1065
§ 23 (15 U.S.C. § 1091) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1091
§ 24 (15 U.S.C. § 1092) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1092
§ 25 (15 U.S.C. § 1093) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1093
§ 26 (15 U.S.C. § 1094) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1094
§ 27 (15 U.S.C. § 1095) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1095
§ 28 (15 U.S.C. § 1096) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1096
§ 43 (15 U.S.C. § 1125) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1125
§ 45 (15 U.S.C. § 1127) http://functionasamark.com/15USC1051.html#1127
37 CFR § 2.101(b): 37 CFR § 2.104(a); 37 CFR § 2.112(a); 37 CFR § 2.133(b); 37 CFR § 2.133(c); 37 CFR § 2.99(h); 37 CFR § 2.133(c); 37 CFR § 2.111(b); 37 CFR § 2.119(e); 37 CFR § 2.116(c); 37 CFR § 2.126; 37 CFR § 2.99(h) http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp309.html
37 CFR § 2.126; 37 CFR § 2.106(b); 37 CFR § 2.114(b) http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp311.html
37 CFR § 2.116(b) http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp701tbmp702.html
37 CFR § 2.121 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp701tbmp702.html
37 CFR § 2.123; 37 CFR § 2.124; 37 CFR § 2.125; 37 CFR § 2.126 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp703.html
37 CFR § 2.120; 37 CFR 2.122 http://trademarkqq.com/tbmp704.html
Answering Office Actions
There are no canned answers on how to answer trademark refusals from office actions because there are many refusals that are not typical refusals. Registration of a mark is specific to the facts involved. Some refusals are dependent not only on the trademark being proposed (very fact specific) but also on how the application is filled out, especially the specimens submitted. (For instance, many specimens do NOT show the trademark Functioning As A Mark.). Sometimes just a better specimen is all it takes. Sometimes a better identification of goods and services. Sometimes parts of the trademark must be disclaimed. Sometimes the applicable law must be examined and arguments made that are very specific to the actual words and designs being proposed. Sometimes the only choice is amending to the Supplemental Register. It depends on what is being rejected and why.
Not every office action has an answer, some proposed trademark applications just do not comply with U.S. Trademark Law (and do not qualify for common law protection) because they are either conflicting marks, lack distinctiveness, or lack acquired secondary meaning or the capability of acquiring secondary meaning. Sometimes a new application can solve the problem, sometimes the mark must be incorporated with other elements to add distinctiveness.
If your trademark has value and you want to preserve the trade identity rights that
you have already invested and secure more rights through federal registration, it
may be best to hire a legal representative to answer your office action as prescribed
within the USPTO Trademark Rules and Procedures. The cost of having Not Just Patents
® Legal Services provide your Response to Office Action (ROA), Amendment to Allege
Use (AAU), or Statement of Use (SOU) may be less than what you think and the time
saved may be months or years. Call us at 1-
For new potential trademarks, we suggest a Not Just Patents Five-
To Verify a potential trademark is strong, available to use, and ready to register, the process should be more than a direct hit federal search. To maximize the commercial strength and minimize the weaknesses of a trademark, we start with these steps:
4) Verify the potential mark (as currently used) Functions As A Mark, and
5) Verify that the Goods and Services ID is both the correct and the maximum claim that are user can make and verify that the Goods and Services ID meets USPTO requirements before filing.
*We don’t stop here but this is a great start!
We can provide a quick and economical Response to Office Action (ROA). See Why Should I Have A Trademark Attorney Answer My Office Action if you have already applied and been refused. If someone is using your trademark in a way that harms you, we may be able to stop them through an opposition or a cancellation proceeding. If you are being opposed or are threatened with cancellation, we may be able to help as well. Timing is very important for a bunch of reasons: Opposition times are very short, times to answer Petitions to Cancel are only 40 days from when the petitions are filed, times to answer Oppositions can be very short, and sitting on your rights in general can cause problems. Don’t delay calling. We can help.
©2008-
Call: 1-
Not Just
Patents®
Legal Services
StrongTrademark.com
A strong trademark is distinguishable from others and identifies a UNIQUE source of a product or service
PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418
1-
info@notjustpatents.com
Search Not Just Patents® sites: